temple of zeus and a strategic hero, problem solvedOmega wrote:
Howitzers are strong. Howitzers behind walls... Not so much. Once the walls come down, Howitzers die too fast to do all that much.
mod no rush
Moderator: taco
-
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:35 pm
Re: mod no rush
- Omega
- Administrator
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:56 pm
- Lobby Username: [-Ts-] Ωmega
- Location: Washington, DC / USA
- Contact:
Re: mod no rush
Select Tridents, right click howitzers, problem not solved.
-
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:35 pm
Re: mod no rush
5 prophets, using storm, navy is death, bombers will attack, gg, deal with it
anyways 2vs2 i wait for answers
anyways 2vs2 i wait for answers
- Omega
- Administrator
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:56 pm
- Lobby Username: [-Ts-] Ωmega
- Location: Washington, DC / USA
- Contact:
Re: mod no rush
I'm pretty sure that Temples are buildings that can be built in Modern. It's been awhile since I've played EE though, but I know they're build-able in all the other epochs
-
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:35 pm
Re: mod no rush
iis there a new feature that allows to build temples on sea?
- Omega
- Administrator
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:56 pm
- Lobby Username: [-Ts-] Ωmega
- Location: Washington, DC / USA
- Contact:
Re: mod no rush
Temples are built on land.
Temples have a range of effect.
That range of effect extends to the sea.
We're playing on a large islands map.
Temples have a range of effect.
That range of effect extends to the sea.
We're playing on a large islands map.
-
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:35 pm
Re: mod no rush
thats bullshit temple range is not that much
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:41 am
- Lobby Username: Die Gurke
Re: mod no rush
Wtf Tridents have Really Long Range so you can Easy kepp them in Temple Range or/and retreat to Coast id hurrican comes
[22:23:06] [-Ts-] Tricky: i dont even know what my name is anymore
-
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:35 pm
Re: mod no rush
we talk about large map and large island i guess
air will always win against navy, u have so many options
prophets, siege, air
air will always win against navy, u have so many options
prophets, siege, air
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:23 am
- Lobby Username: >Heros<=Captain Nemo*
Re: mod no rush
2v2 large islands... even better for navy. Ill take that challenge with Omega.
bosshaft: "A warm pussy is so much better than a dick! Trust me."
-
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:35 pm
Re: mod no rush
good. tell me when u have time, i ll play that 2vs2 with a friend.
2vs2. Large map. Large islands. Nr 60f11
2vs2. Large map. Large islands. Nr 60f11
-
- Novice Member
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 8:13 pm
- Lobby Username: ben77
Re: mod no rush
I would want in on that challenge if I thought bosshaft was competent. I'm not sure on that count though.
I think you guys are overestimating the effectiveness of cruisers. They're good, but without fighter support mass bombers with 35+18 nukes will kill most of them in one go. Also siege will prevent you from placing cruisers in the channels between islands, so in a 3v3 or 4v4 a bomber pocket can just focus on obliterating the enemy shoreline if he chooses. The problem is space really; there just isn't enough of it on a large map with large islands to keep more than 25-30 cruisers in a position to 1) attack enemy air and 2) not get annihilated by enemy siege or naval units.
This whole conversation is a bit silly anyway. In a 1v1 situation air will beat navy because all the air player has to do is maintain a stalemate until the navy runs out of wood, at which point the end is in sight. In a team game situation you obviously want your team to have a mix of navy and air, at which point the outcome depends on how well the two coordinate their actions.
In all honesty, I don't think I'd want to play a 4v4 large map f11 60 game. Wing getting hit at 60 with mass tridents and a glut of nukes shielded by B52s with tournament buildings...sounds like a clusterfuck.
I think you guys are overestimating the effectiveness of cruisers. They're good, but without fighter support mass bombers with 35+18 nukes will kill most of them in one go. Also siege will prevent you from placing cruisers in the channels between islands, so in a 3v3 or 4v4 a bomber pocket can just focus on obliterating the enemy shoreline if he chooses. The problem is space really; there just isn't enough of it on a large map with large islands to keep more than 25-30 cruisers in a position to 1) attack enemy air and 2) not get annihilated by enemy siege or naval units.
This whole conversation is a bit silly anyway. In a 1v1 situation air will beat navy because all the air player has to do is maintain a stalemate until the navy runs out of wood, at which point the end is in sight. In a team game situation you obviously want your team to have a mix of navy and air, at which point the outcome depends on how well the two coordinate their actions.
In all honesty, I don't think I'd want to play a 4v4 large map f11 60 game. Wing getting hit at 60 with mass tridents and a glut of nukes shielded by B52s with tournament buildings...sounds like a clusterfuck.
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:23 am
- Lobby Username: >Heros<=Captain Nemo*
Re: mod no rush
Aaaand the navy wins. Took some time due to cloacking but we can quote boss:
[00:01:51] Pierre Vogel: gg btw its impossible to do anything against 50 tridents
Yes exactly.
btw it's not like we're doing 2x navy. one is fighters one is navy, effectively beating those bombs to death. No room in between islands at first but tridents will clear the shore sooner or later it's simply too hard to keep fixing walls the entire game. Siege gets killed here and there.
gg tho.
[00:01:51] Pierre Vogel: gg btw its impossible to do anything against 50 tridents
Yes exactly.
btw it's not like we're doing 2x navy. one is fighters one is navy, effectively beating those bombs to death. No room in between islands at first but tridents will clear the shore sooner or later it's simply too hard to keep fixing walls the entire game. Siege gets killed here and there.
gg tho.
bosshaft: "A warm pussy is so much better than a dick! Trust me."
- Arntzen
- Administrator
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:13 am
- Lobby Username: _[eC]_Arntzen_
- Location: Norway
Re: mod no rush
Yes, yes and yes! This is what I've been (trying to say?) saying all along.. Glad at least someone agrees.ben77 wrote: I think you guys are overestimating the effectiveness of cruisers. They're good, but without fighter support mass bombers with 35+18 nukes will kill most of them in one go. Also siege will prevent you from placing cruisers in the channels between islands, so in a 3v3 or 4v4 a bomber pocket can just focus on obliterating the enemy shoreline if he chooses. The problem is space really; there just isn't enough of it on a large map with large islands to keep more than 25-30 cruisers in a position to 1) attack enemy air and 2) not get annihilated by enemy siege or naval units.
@Nemo: who played and on what mapsize/map type? What did the guys do?
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:23 am
- Lobby Username: >Heros<=Captain Nemo*
Re: mod no rush
2v2 large map large islands as requested. they were both air with some siege at least on my side. Omega was all fighters and I was all navy.
screen to show what it looked like. taken from a saved game before I landed some army/cits on black's island. Game unexpectedly crashed later.
screen to show what it looked like. taken from a saved game before I landed some army/cits on black's island. Game unexpectedly crashed later.
bosshaft: "A warm pussy is so much better than a dick! Trust me."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests