I Officaily am a bigger Spamer then X Warrior 411
-
peow130
- Noob @ Everything
- Posts: 1137
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:28 pm
Re: I Officaily am a bigger Spamer then X Warrior 411
My rank is still teh pwn
SlipKnoT wrote:swords are 30 u idiot.
-
Moo
- Spam4food
- Posts: 943
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 11:21 pm
Re: I Officaily am a bigger Spamer then X Warrior 411
peow130 wrote:My rank is still teh pwned
-
Silence
- Full Member
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:14 pm
- Xfire: donthavethiseither
Re: I Officaily am a bigger Spamer then X Warrior 411
Destroyer, if that little cunt hacker dindt hack/crash our ee forum id be nr 1 :'(
I lost like 200 posts with that grrrr
I lost like 200 posts with that grrrr
- Omega
- Administrator
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:56 pm
- Lobby Username: [-Ts-] Ωmega
- Location: Washington, DC / USA
- Contact:
Re: I Officaily am a bigger Spamer then X Warrior 411
I lost more than that, and 100s more than peow did... So I think it's safer to say I'd be number 1 (and please note, I am not saying I'd be number 1, since I suspect it'd be peow still). In fact, I don't think you even have a remotely reasonable claim to possibly being #1 if you didn't loose your posts.Silence wrote:Destroyer, if that little cunt hacker dindt hack/crash our ee forum id be nr 1 :'(
I lost like 200 posts with that grrrr
Especially when we consider that:
You have 97 posts now. If you lost 200, you'd have 297. This means that you'd be in 9th place, still over 500 posts behind the top poster now and that's assuming they didn't loose ANY posts at all. Now, lets consider that I lost more posts than you are claiming to have lost, but we'll make it 200 just for the sake of numbers here... This means you'd be about 650 posts behind me. When we factor in the ridiculous spammage that was peow on the forums for several weeks (and well, most of his posts are spam anyway...), he'd probably have just increased the rate of posting to STILL beat me handily, so in reality, you'd likely be ~700 posts behind the top poster. Either way, you'd be more than double your post count BEHIND the top poster.
Top Posters Now wrote:Username Posts
peow130 817
Omega 742
Ghost 715
Destroyer 580
10010 1111 10 563
X warrior411 499
inola 462
PeLlE 384
taco 268
Sexacutioner 240

-
Silence
- Full Member
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:14 pm
- Xfire: donthavethiseither
Re: I Officaily am a bigger Spamer then X Warrior 411
just let me have some funOmega wrote:I lost more than that, and 100s more than peow did... So I think it's safer to say I'd be number 1 (and please note, I am not saying I'd be number 1, since I suspect it'd be peow still). In fact, I don't think you even have a remotely reasonable claim to possibly being #1 if you didn't loose your posts.Silence wrote:Destroyer, if that little cunt hacker dindt hack/crash our ee forum id be nr 1 :'(
I lost like 200 posts with that grrrr
Especially when we consider that:
You have 97 posts now. If you lost 200, you'd have 297. This means that you'd be in 9th place, still over 500 posts behind the top poster now and that's assuming they didn't loose ANY posts at all. Now, lets consider that I lost more posts than you are claiming to have lost, but we'll make it 200 just for the sake of numbers here... This means you'd be about 650 posts behind me. When we factor in the ridiculous spammage that was peow on the forums for several weeks (and well, most of his posts are spam anyway...), he'd probably have just increased the rate of posting to STILL beat me handily, so in reality, you'd likely be ~700 posts behind the top poster. Either way, you'd be more than double your post count BEHIND the top poster.
Top Posters Now wrote:Username Posts
peow130 817
Omega 742
Ghost 715
Destroyer 580
10010 1111 10 563
X warrior411 499
inola 462
PeLlE 384
taco 268
Sexacutioner 240
ima gonna get myself an internet chick/dude :p
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests